Publisher of Open Access Quality Scientific Journal

Journal of Contemporary Agriculture and Bioscience

Research Article

Morpho-Molecular Characterization of Capsicum annuum L; Drought-Responsive Traits under PEG-treated Hydroponic Conditions

Khandaker Nafiz Bayazid*
Khandaker Nafiz Bayazid*

Department of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, City University, Dhaka-1340 and Institute of Biotechnology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202. Email: nafizbayazid@gmail.com

,Jannatul Ferdous,
Jannatul Ferdous,

Institute of Biotechnology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202

,Quazi Mostaque Mahmud
Quazi Mostaque Mahmud

Department of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, City University, Dhaka-1340

,Md. Shahidul Haque Bir
Md. Shahidul Haque Bir

Department of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, City University, Dhaka-1340

and Md. Anait Ullaha
Md. Anait Ullaha

Department of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, City University, Dhaka-1340


Received: 14 August, 2026 || Accepted: 02 September, 2026 || Published: 10 September, 2026

 

A b s t r a c t

Drought stress significantly limits Capsicum annuum L. production in Bangladesh, particularly during the rabi season, highlighting the need to understand adaptive mechanisms for developing climate-resilient cultivars. This study investigated drought-induced changes in root architecture at the phytomer level and associated physiological and molecular responses among 13 Bangladeshi Capsicum genotypes. Plants were grown hydroponically and exposed to PEG-8000-induced osmotic stress (0%, 0.3%, and 0.6% w/v) during the reproductive stage (R2) under a completely randomized design. Severe stress (0.6% PEG) reduced root hair length and diameter by approximately 48% and 52%, respectively (p < 0.001), resulting in an estimated 8.5-fold reduction in root absorptive surface area. However, tolerant genotypes, particularly Pasarella RZ F1 and BARI Capsicum 1, maintained superior phytomer integrity, showing only a 3.7% reduction in Pr2 axis length compared with 28% in the susceptible Alexander F1 genotype. Pasarella RZ F1 exhibited enhanced drought adaptation through increased abscisic acid (ABA) accumulation (23.2%; 8.2 ± 0.6 to 10.1 ± 0.8 ng g⁻¹ FW; p < 0.05), which was strongly associated with stomatal regulation (r = −0.82). Elevated ascorbate levels (40%) contributed to oxidative stress protection, while glutathione remained stable. The CA12 marker carrying the 180 bp allele showed strong associations with root robustness (φ = 0.87, p = 0.003) and ABA accumulation (φ = 0.79, p = 0.01). These findings reveal that drought tolerance in C. annuum is governed by coordinated root, physiological, and genetic mechanisms, and highlight CA12-linked traits as promising targets for marker-assisted breeding of drought-resilient pepper cultivars.

Keywords: Capsicum annuum; drought tolerance; root architecture; phytomer; ABA signaling; oxidative stress; PEG-8000; marker-assisted breeding.


Copyright information: Copyright © 2026 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License


    How to cite: Bayazid,K.N., Ferdous, J., Mahmud, Q.M., Bir, M.S.H. and Ullah, M.A. 2026. Morpho-molecular characterization of Capsicum annuum L; drought-responsive traits under PEG-treated hydroponic conditions, Journal of Contemporary Agriculture and Bioscience 3(1), 24-30.  

 

REFERENCES


  1. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute. (2021). BARI annual report 2020–2021. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute.
  2. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. (2023). Statistical yearbook of Bangladesh 2023. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics.
  3. Cheng, J., Zhao, Z., Li, B., Qin, C., Wu, Z., Trejo-Saavedra, D. L., ... Hu, K. (2016). A comprehensive characterization of simple sequence repeats in pepper genomes provides valuable resources for marker development in Capsicum. Scientific Reports, 6, 18919. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18919
  4. Comas, L. H., Becker, S. R., Cruz, V. M. V., Byrne, P. F., & Dierig, D. A. (2013). Root traits contributing to plant productivity under drought. Frontiers in Plant Science, 4, 442.
  5. Dias, M. C., Correia, S., Serôdio, J., Silva, A. M., & Freitas, H. (2021). Drought effects on photosynthesis and antioxidant defenses in Capsicum annuum L. at different developmental stages. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 165, 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.05.004
  6. FAOSTAT. (2022). Crops and livestock products. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/faostat/
  7. Flexas, J., & Medrano, H. (2002). Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants: Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations revisited. Annals of Botany, 89(2), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf027
  8. Foyer, C. H., & Noctor, G. (2011). Ascorbate and glutathione: The heart of the redox hub. Plant, Cell & Environment, 34(11), 1807–1814. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02325.x
  9. Haling, R. E., Brown, L. K., Bengough, A. G., Valentine, T. A., White, P. J., Young, I. M., & George, T. S. (2014). Root hair length and rhizosheath mass depend on soil porosity, strength and water content in barley genotypes. Planta, 239(3), 643–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-013-2002-1
  10. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press.
  11. Kuijken, R. C. P., van Eeuwijk, F. A., Marcelis, L. F. M., & Bouwmeester, H. J. (2015). Root phenotyping: From component trait in the lab to breeding. Journal of Experimental Botany, 66(18), 5389–5401. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv239
  12. Kwon, Y. S., Lee, J. M., Yi, G. B., Yi, S. I., Kim, K. M., Soh, E. H., ... Kim, B. D. (2005). Use of SSR markers to complement tests of distinctiveness, uniformity, and stability (DUS) of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) varieties. Molecules and Cells, 19(3), 428–435.
  13. Lynch, J. P. (2018). Rightsizing root phenotypes for drought resistance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 69(13), 3279–3292. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery048
  14. Malika, L. Y., Deshabandu, K. T., De Costa, W. J. M., Ekanayake, S., Herath, S., & Weerakoon, W. W. (2019). Physiological traits determining tolerance to intermittent drought in the Capsicum annuum complex. Scientia Horticulturae, 246, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.10.017
  15. Michel, B. E., & Kaufmann, M. R. (1973). The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000. Plant Physiology, 51(5), 914–916. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.51.5.914
  16. Minamiyama, Y., Tsuro, M., & Hirai, M. (2006). An SSR-based linkage map of Capsicum annuum. Molecular Breeding, 18, 157–169.
  17. Mittler, R., Zandalinas, S. I., Fichman, Y., & Van Breusegem, F. (2022). Reactive oxygen species signalling in plant stress responses. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 23, 663–679. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-022-00499-2
  18. Rahman, M. M., Islam, A. M., & Rahman, G. M. M. (2020). Economic impact of drought on crop production in northwestern Bangladesh. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 2, 100052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2020.100052
  19. Thao, N. P., Khan, M. I. R., Thu, N. B. A., Hoang, X. L. T., Asgher, M., Khan, N. A., & Tran, L. S. P. (2015). Role of ethylene and its cross talk with other signaling molecules in plant responses to drought stress. Plant Physiology, 169(1), 23–42.
  20. Wilkinson, S., & Davies, W. J. (2002). ABA-based chemical signalling: The co-ordination of responses to stress in plants. Plant, Cell & Environment, 25(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00824.x

 


  Article View: 13 times

      
f